- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 19127Law 10 - Method of Scoring 5/18/2008RE: Adult Warren of Sydney, NSW Australia asks...This question is a follow up to question 17882 Howdy all.
Two quickies.
In answering question 17882 referee Contarino says "In no way can a goal be awarded unless the ball crosses under the cross bar and between the goalposts in accordance with law 10. Not that this is relevant here as the ball was never in play but a referee can NEVER award a goal he thought would occur were it not for foul play of some kind"
1) Doesn't he mean "..can never award a goal he thought would NOT occur were it not for foul play of some kind" ?
2) Assuming a ball DID leave the penalty area from a goal kick and then was blown back toward the goal or bounced back toward the goal after striking the referee, then wouldn't the goalkeeper be best to leave it as if it goes into the goal it is a corner kick ("a goal may be scored directly from a goal kick but only against the opposing team" Law 16) whereas if he touches and it still goes into the goal the goal would stand ? (assuming he was not the player that took the kick).
Which brings me to a related question. Say the keeper HAD been the player taking the goalkick in the cicrumstance described in 2) above. He attempts to stop the ball entering the goal on the rebound/blow-back and manages to touch it but is unsuccessful in keeping the ball out of the goal.
Would you consider it in the spirit of the laws of the game to "penalize" him for the infringement of handling the ball before it had been touched by another player (IDFK) rather than award the goal (which would be advantage to the opposing team)?
I realize these are farily unlikely scenarios in real-life situations but I'm sure you gentlemen like having your individual and collective brains tested on these "curly" ones ! :-)
Thanks in advance, Warren. Answer provided by Referee Keith Contarino No. I stand by what I said. A goal has to score in accordance with Law 10. Period. You restate exactly what I said in #1. Wasn't in accordance with Law 10, then referee may not award a goal. 2. Yes. If no one touches the ball blown back in, then a corner kick would be awarded. If the keeper WAS the player that took the kick and he touched the ball a second time before the ball went into the net, the referee should give advantage and still award the goal.
Read other questions answered by Referee Keith Contarino
View Referee Keith Contarino profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 19127
Read other Q & A regarding Law 10 - Method of Scoring
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|