Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 35765

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 10/20/2024

Petr of Prague, Czech Republic Czech Republic asks...

This question is a follow up to question 35760

Perhaps I could have asked more generally like this: The advantage is nullified by the touch of the referee, substitute or outside agent. (The advantage is nullified by something other than the opponent). Does the player who fouled (SPA, careless) before receive a yellow card?

Otherwise, the case from Mr. Dawson's tournament is great :-)

Have a good time. And I hope I'm silent now :-)

Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson

HI Petr,
if there is no advantage then we go back to the original foul, which is SPA, thus a yellow card caution would be shown and the DFK awarded. If it was a DB, AFTER the advantage had in the opinion of the referee been achieved, then no caution, just the DB restart.
Cheers



Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson

View Referee Richard Dawson profile

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Petr
Thanks for the follow up.

As a general comment I say to referees to ask themselves this notional question “Would they send off the player for a second caution in these situations”?
There are times when there has to be a judgement call on a card so this question is helpful in my opinion.

So in your example the referee plays advantage on a careless foul that had the potential to stop a promising attack with play continuing and advantage fully realised with the ball then hitting the referee who stops play to give the ball back to the attacking team in possession. What would be the judgement opinion of a decision to caution for the original foul which could have the potential to send the player off?

It is for this reason that the Law book states in a few places **...if the offence was interfering with or stopping a promising attack, the player is not cautioned.**



Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 35765
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>