Soccer Referee Resources
Home
Ask a Question
Articles
Recent Questions
Search

You-Call-It
Previous You-Call-It's

VAR (Video Assistant Referee)

Q&A Quick Search
The Field of Play
The Ball
The Players
The Players Equipment
The Referee
The Other Match Officials
The Duration of the Match
The Start and Restart of Play
The Ball In and Out of Play
Determining the Outcome of a Match
Offside
Fouls and Misconduct
Free Kicks
Penalty kick
Throw In
Goal Kick
Corner Kick


Common Sense
Kicks - Penalty Mark
The Technical Area
The Fourth Official
Pre-Game
Fitness
Mechanics
Attitude and Control
League Specific
High School


Common Acronyms
Meet The Ref
Advertise
Contact AskTheRef
Help Wanted
About AskTheRef


Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000


Panel Login

Question Number: 35716

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 9/22/2024

RE: Competitive Adult

Peter Babbage of Hjorring, Denmark asks...

A player is only about a yard from the goal line and about to shoot. The keeper is diving hoping to smother a shot. A defender tackles him from behind clumsily. A penalty is awarded . The tackler gets a yellow card but should he have as it could be considered I guess a double punishment as a spot kick ensues. So my question is was the card correct?

Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh

Hi Peter
Thanks for the question.

The answer hinges on whether the referee opined that the foul challenge was a genuine attempt to play the ball in which case a DOGSO red card gets reduced to a yellow with the award of the penalty kick. A one on one eith the goalkeeper in front of goal on an attacker about to shoot reads like denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity to me.

I suppose in recent times referees have tended to go with a caution in many situations unless the offence is a pull back, a push, a handling or a no chance of playing the ball challenge in DOGSO situations. I have seen a few DOGSO situations that probably should have been reds yet the leniency of the law change gives the referees wriggle room in not sending off the player if they opine that it was not truly egregious and deemed it an attempt to play the ball, simply downgrading the red to yellow with the penalty award.

If it is not a DOGSO situation the referee has to consider whether the challenge was reckless in its own right in which case it is a yellow card. If it is just a simple foul with nothing else the penalty is sufficient punishment.

From your description I believe a caution may have been correct either way as a DOGSO dismissal gets reduced to a caution if it is opined it was an attempt to play the ball or a reckless challenge from behind would normally be a caution. The latter could make it a DOGSO red if a referee thought it was not a genuine attempt to play the ball. Either way it is a card of some colour.





Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh

View Referee Joe McHugh profile

Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson

Hi Peter,
under the old LOTG a red card send off for DOGSO if the 4 criteria were met a reduction in numbers by the opposition was the stated way to punish the offence be it inside or outside the PA with the DFK or PK restart, depending on the location.

What they realized was on the resulting PKs, they were most often converted so the opposition effectively regained their lost opportunity to score and the effect of the defenders having to play a man down for a wayward challenge was deemed as too harsh.

In cases where it was a breaking up of the attacking play (SPA) we only cautioned then showed just a yellow card if that foul occurred inside the PA even though it met the red card DOGSO criteria!

Their thinking was if the challenge was a reasonable effort to win the ball, not a blatant effort to destroy the player, making no effort to play the ball or use the hand to prevent the ball from crossing the resulting PK foul was sufficient to the lost opportunity to score now we only look at the type of force used .

This did NOT apply if the foul occurred OUTSIDE the PA as the DFK is not as good or as certain as a PK. If DOGSO criteria were present the red card shown & the player is sent off reducing his team by a player

If the foul inside the PA was careless just PK, if it was reckless a PK and a caution, if it was DOGSO but SPA again caution and a PK . However if it was SFP,VC, excessive then DOGSO is not the consideration at all, showing red card, send off, reducing numbers and resulting PK is appropriate!

You say clumsily, as in careless or was it a SPA (stop promising attack) which mitigates the DOGSO criteria? If a PK was awarded a caution, show yellow is likely correct.
Cheers



Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson

View Referee Richard Dawson profile

Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 35716
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct

Soccer Referee Extras

Did you Ask the Ref? Find your answer here.


Enter Question Number

If you received a response regarding a submitted question enter your question number above to find the answer




Offside Question?

Offside Explained by Chuck Fleischer & Richard Dawson, Former & Current Editor of AskTheRef

<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>