- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 35082Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct 8/26/2023RE: Senior 5 Adult Colin Davies of Brighton , Sussex England asks...Defender passes back to the keeper he has to dive to stop it going into the goal using his/her hand.What decision? Is this a goal scoring situation, thanks. Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Colin Thanks for the question. This is not a situation that a goalkeeper can be cautioned or dismissed for as it is not a goal scoring opportunity in the context of the DOGSO law. The goalkeeper is expected to save the goal so no disciplinary sanction can be taken on the goalkeeper inside the penalty area for such situations. The restart is an IDFK only with no card.
There is one exception to this situation which is the double touch handling by the goalkeeper inside the penalty area. The goalkeeper must be sanctioned if this offence stops a promising attack or denies an opponent or the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity.
The rest of the time it is an IDFK only and no card.
I recall once where a defender kicked the ball from a goal kick by his goalkeeper and I was unsure what the defenders intention was yet the ball ended going back to the goal. I was not sure if he tried to help it on and mis kicked it or he intended to kick it to the goalkeeper. Anyway the goalkeeper had to save the ball by pushing it over the bar. I went with the corner kick and there was no complaints.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson HI Colin, it is NOT a DOGSO it is only an INDFK with no caution as saving the ball from entering the goal is the Keepers main job. If the ball had scored it is then a kick off and registered as a own goal . You would not award the indfk as the goal is of greater advantage!
The issue of classifying the kick as a deliberate pass to the keeper is the real question. Your choice of the word, pass, fairly reeks of certainty that indeed if this was a deliberate kick intended as such, not a body or head pass or sliding challenge redirecting the ball , then an INDFK is correct. Yet, keep in mind the team benefiting did nothing to truly deserve a shot at goal for what could be a mistake , a slip that the kick redirected it back a bit weirdly. As my esteemed colleague Ref McHugh pointed out when he awarded a corner for a tip out created by an errant pass, it was likely what all expected.
After their 6 seconds of total ball possession the keeper cannot pick the ball up a second time. after releasing the uncontestable ball back into active play! However, they can be forgiven if they react to a mistake as in dropping it accidently, miskick, slip or a goofy winds blow it back. This get out of a bad spot, does not hold to a double touch created by a bad goal kick or free kick. The keeper must be cautioned if this offence stops a promising attack or if it denies a goal, red carded and sent off reducing his team by a player if an obvious goal-scoring opportunity. Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Peter Grove Hi Colin, The decision here as my colleagues have mentioned should be an indirect free kick. There should be no card of any kind, even if a goal could have been the result if the keeper had not handled the ball. This is because there is a specific mention in Law 12, as follows:
"If the goalkeeper handles the ball inside their penalty area when not permitted to do so, an indirect free kick is awarded but there is no disciplinary sanction."
The reasons for this, as alluded to above, are related to the traditions of the game whereby it is, and always has been, a basic part of the goalkeeper's role in the game to prevent the ball from entering the net, so it would be seen as being against the spirit of the game to sanction them for doing so.
Read other questions answered by Referee Peter Grove
View Referee Peter Grove profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 35082
Read other Q & A regarding Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|