- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 31520Law 5 - The Referee 5/9/2017RE: Competritive Adult MICHAEL GEBRESLASSIE of OAKLAND, CA United States asks...The assistant referee checked the nets before starting the game. However, a ball enters the goal through a hole in the side of the net when going out for a goal kick. The referees were confused and they awarded the goal. Is this a technical error? What can be done about this? Thank you Mike Answer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Hi Mike, In association football (soccer), a ghost goal (or phantom goal) is a questionable goal, usually involving uncertainty as to whether or not a ball crossed the goal line. This incident shows just how important such a pre-match referee pitch inspection can prove to be! If during a match the AR or CR recognizes the ball DID in fact enter through a hole in the side of the net they should patch that hole before restarting and award the goal kick or corner as to how it occurred!! Given a goal WAS awarded means they do not recognize the ball did enter through the hole. They must feel the ball did in fact enter under the cross bar, between the posts and over the goal line as that is the ONLY way a goal can be legally scored As an opinion on a fact of play nothing can be done once the ghost goal is restarted with the kick off. ! If a video showed it as conclusive proof perhaps an association might consider a replay having a word to the referees about better inspection of the goals prior to the match but I doubt anything changes unless there is sufficient time and available fields to replay . Such things happen, it rarely ends favourably unless it is CLEARLY seen by all to be exactly what transpired!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2466352/Stefan-Kiesslings-phantom-goal-gives-Leverkusen-win-Hoffenheim.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTKZR7mJH38
Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Michael Over the years there have been many *ghost* goal awarded by referees on the basis that the ball entered the goal between the goalposts and under the crossbar. Video replays subsequently showed that the referees made errors in judgement not in law. Once the goal is awarded and the game kicks off again nothing can be done. In the goal mentioned by Referee Dawson the German Bundesliga ruled that the result would stand as referee Felix Brych did not break any rules in making his decision so it was not an error in law just an error in judgement. Although there was a ghost goal awarded previously in the Bundesliga which resulted in the game being replayed I expect that the Bundesliga could have been rebuffed for the decision hence its later decision to allow the result to stand. Here are a few more https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9JCSa8nmBs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCshUH6wKSc I recall many seasons ago in an Over 40 game a team claimed that a ball entered the goal over the cross bar through a hole in the net. It looked like a goal to me and there was no obvious hole in the net. There was no video evidence to disprove the call. A cursory view of the net did not show any hole and a more detailed examination after the game on my own showed no hole that a ball could enter through. That was my opinion based on my pre match inspection. To this day I believe that the goal was good.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Peter Grove Hi Mike, Unfortunately for the team conceding the goal, this is not considered a technical error, just an error in judgement. As my colleagues have pointed out, there have been numerous incidents of such goals. Although there was the one occasion when a game was replayed, as Ref McHugh alludes to, FIFA raised an official objection to this, since replaying a game for this reason contravenes the provision in Law 5 that: ''The decisions of the referee regarding facts connected with play, including whether or not a goal is scored and the result of the match, are final.'' To the best of my knowledge, no other game has been replayed before or since, due to a so-called 'ghost goal.' So although it may seem unfair, officially there is nothing that can be done about such a refereeing mistake. Incidentally, when the German game referred to was replayed, it did not turn out well for the team that had conceded the ghost goal. Having lost the initial game 2-1, 1 FC Nuernberg lost the replayed game 5-0 and ironically enough, were relegated on goal difference.
Read other questions answered by Referee Peter Grove
View Referee Peter Grove profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 31520
Read other Q & A regarding Law 5 - The Referee
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|