- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 25179Law 13 - Free Kicks 7/6/2011RE: Rec Adult Stephen McNeill of Kentville, Nova Scotia Canada asks...During the taking of an IFK, can a player of the attacking team place his foot on top of the ball and hold it there until giving it a slight movement just before his teammate running up strikes the ball, thus giving the opposition no chance to move forward at all? Answer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi Stephen There is nothing wrong with a player putting his foot on top of the ball at a restart. However the ball must be kicked and moved for the ball to be in play. If the movement is undetectable then the ball is not in play. The referee is the sole judge of that. I might point out that feinting is allowed at a free kick so there is nothing wrong with a player pretending to kick the ball to a team mate with a feint kick at an IDFK . The defending team cannot move forward until the ball is kicked so the chances of defenders moving forward legally, if done correctly in that situation, is very limited also. Another example would be where a player with his foot on top of the ball withdraws it and then heels the ball into play. Nothing wrong with that either.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Jason Wright Hi Stephen, This is certainly permitted - however there's a risk with utilising such a slight movement to put the ball in play. It's always possible that the referee will miss the touch. Also, I know some referees who believe that 'touched and moves' mean that the ball must roll. I would argue that a wobble is sufficient, but something to be aware of nonetheless.
Read other questions answered by Referee Jason Wright
View Referee Jason Wright profileAnswer provided by Referee Gary Voshol The official interpretation of USSF is that touched and moved means the ball has visibly gone from one position to another, from here to there. Using the sole of the foot to effect this movement is considered a kick. You would have to check if Canada has a similar interpretation.
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 25179
Read other Q & A regarding Law 13 - Free Kicks
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|