- Soccer Referee Resources
- Home
- Ask a Question
- Articles
- Recent Questions
- Search
- You-Call-It
- Previous You-Call-It's
-
VAR (Video Assistant Referee)
- Q&A Quick Search
- The Field of Play
- The Ball
- The Players
- The Players Equipment
- The Referee
- The Other Match Officials
- The Duration of the Match
- The Start and Restart of Play
- The Ball In and Out of Play
- Determining the Outcome of a Match
- Offside
- Fouls and Misconduct
- Free Kicks
- Penalty kick
- Throw In
- Goal Kick
- Corner Kick
- Common Sense
- Kicks - Penalty Mark
- The Technical Area
- The Fourth Official
- Pre-Game
- Fitness
- Mechanics
- Attitude and Control
- League Specific
- High School
- Common Acronyms
- Meet The Ref
- Advertise
- Contact AskTheRef
- Help Wanted
- About AskTheRef
- Soccer Rules Changes 1580-2000
- Panel Login
|
Question Number: 22031Character, Attitude and Control 9/21/2009RE: rec Under 11 William Everitt of Brandon, MS US asks...10 year old girl. Goalie punts the ball up in the air (she is not very good) and it goes maybe 5 feet forward and she catches it again in the penalty area what do I do? I called an indirect free kick from where she touched the ball again for the opposing team. I am not 100% on this call. Answer provided by Referee Gary Voshol That was the 100% correct call by the Laws of the Game. Now you have to ask yourself, was the punishment worthy of the crime? Could you have viewed the infraction as being trifling, having no effect on the game? Then you wouldn't need to call it; you could have a quiet word with the goalkeeper at a later time. You have to balance that against the sense of justice that 10-year-olds have. Would the players accept a no-call, or would they be outraged that you were ignoring obvious infractions of the Laws? Or would they not even know that something was wrong?
Read other questions answered by Referee Gary Voshol
View Referee Gary Voshol profileAnswer provided by Referee Richard Dawson Somethings at certain levels are more or less trifling than others! This might be one of those times to explain consequences instead of demonstrate them. Or consider that was a bounce within the 6 seconds of allowed handling possession and she should get rid of that ball post haste! You applied the laws they accepted it perhaps it was the best course of action as it is the law! Ony if the opposing team was disadvantaged is there reason to see the redeployment issue in a harsher light FIFA QUOTE Offences committed by goalkeepers A goalkeeper is not permitted to keep control of the ball in his hands for more than six seconds. A goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball: ? while the ball is between his hands or between his hand and any surface (e.g. ground, own body) ? while holding the ball in his outstretched open hand ? while in the act of bouncing it on the ground or tossing it into the air When a goalkeeper has gained possession of the ball with his hands, he cannot be challenged by an opponent. A goalkeeper is not permitted to touch the ball with his hand inside his own penalty area in the following circumstances: ? if he handles the ball again after it has been released from his possession and has not touched any other player: ? the goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from him, for example, after he has made a save ? possession of the ball includes the goalkeeper deliberately parrying the ball ? if he touches the ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him by a team-mate ? if he touches the ball with his hands after he has received it directly from a throw-in taken by a team-mate Restart of play ? Indirect free kick from the position where the offence occurred (see Law 13 ? Position of Free Kick) END QUOTE Cheers
Read other questions answered by Referee Richard Dawson
View Referee Richard Dawson profileAnswer provided by Referee Joe McHugh Hi William Correct call in law and the restart is an indirect free kick. I agree with my colleagues and ask is it the 'best' decision for the game. I would probably, given the age group, allow play to continue and then have a quiet word with the coach explaining the law. Reads to me like some kicking practise is required by the young goalkeeper.
Read other questions answered by Referee Joe McHugh
View Referee Joe McHugh profileAnswer provided by Referee Keith Contarino Your call is what the Laws Of The Game call for so you were correct as to the Letter of the Law. But I can tell from the tone of your question you are having trouble justifying this call given the age and skill level of the players. You are also interested in the Spirit of the Law. Fortunately for referees of soccer Law 5 gives us the authority to ignore breeches of the Law we find trifling and have no effect on the game. In future games at this level you have this to fall back on when trying to decide what's best for the Spirit of that particular game. A word to the coach and explanation of what the rules are is often all that's needed at this level of play.
Read other questions answered by Referee Keith Contarino
View Referee Keith Contarino profile- Ask a Follow Up Question to Q# 22031
Read other Q & A regarding Character, Attitude and Control
-
|
- Soccer Referee Extras
-
<>
This web site and the answers to these questions are not sanctioned by or affiliated with any governing body of soccer. The free opinions expressed on this site should not be considered official interpretations of the Laws of the Game and are merely opinions of AskTheRef and our panel members. If you need an official ruling you should contact your state or local representative through your club or league. On AskTheRef your questions are answered by a panel of licensed referees. See Meet The Ref for details about our panel members. While there is no charge for asking the questions, donation to maintain the site are welcomed! <>
|